PARTLY

Partly true: MiniMax H3 is a real current video model with native audio, but 'the number one tool for AI clones' is one creator's opinion with no side-by-side shown, sold with a comment-for-guide hook

Facebook · Oct 2026

The claim'The number one tool to make AI clones, and no, it is not HeyGen. After testing HeyGen, after testing Seedance 2.0, the best AI model to do lip syncing with your voice clone is actually MiniMax H3. The quality is amazing and you get native 9:16. It is highly easy to use and better than HeyGen.' Hook: 'Comment the word avatar and I'll send you a free setup guide.'

The names check out. MiniMax H3 is the current flagship on MiniMax's Hailuo video site, described there as a native multimodal generation model, and third-party pages describe it as producing 5 to 15 second clips at 2K with native stereo audio and mixed text, image, video and audio references. Seedance 2.0 is a real ByteDance model with joint audio-video generation, since superseded by Seedance 2.5 in July. HeyGen is the incumbent avatar product with a free tier and paid plans from $29 a month, with voice cloning on paid plans only. So the comparison is between real things. What the reel does not do is show any of it. There is no H3 output, no HeyGen output, no side-by-side, no voice-clone test; it is one talking head saying 'the quality is amazing.' 'Best' here is taste, not measurement, and the three tools are not the same category: HeyGen is a turnkey avatar service with a studio, a script box and a voice-clone pipeline, while H3 is a general video model you prompt with references and your own audio. 'Native 9:16' is true of most current video models and is not a differentiator. 'Highly easy to use' is doing a lot of work for a tool that needs you to supply a cloned voice track from somewhere else. The free setup guide is the lead magnet for a DM funnel; expect an affiliate link or a course behind it.

What holds up

Reel read frame by frame: a single outdoor selfie shot with captions ('Best AI Clone', 'is actually MiniMax H3', 'Hey Gen'); no generated clip, no comparison, no product UI appears anywhere in the 24 seconds.
hailuoai.video (MiniMax) read: H3 is listed as the current flagship, 'native multimodal generation, precise multimodal editing'; lip-sync and avatar workflows are not spelled out on the landing page, and third-party summaries describe 5 to 15 second 2K clips with native audio and multimodal references.
HeyGen pricing page read: Free $0 (3 videos a month, 1 minute, watermark), Creator $29, Pro $49, Business $149; voice cloning is on paid plans only. Seedance 2.0 is ByteDance's audio-video joint model, with Seedance 2.5 released July 31, 2026.
The hook is a comment-for-DM 'free setup guide'; the caption carries no disclosure of how the creator earns from the recommendation.

What doesn’t

'Number one' and 'better than HeyGen' are stated without a single generated frame on screen.
Apples to oranges: a general video model with native audio versus a turnkey avatar service with its own voice cloning.
'Native 9:16' is table stakes for current video models, not an edge.
Comment-for-DM guide funnel with no disclosure of affiliate or course interest.

The catch

H3 is worth a test, but run the test yourself with your own face and voice before you believe anyone's 'best.' A general video model gives you more control and cheaper clips; a service like HeyGen gives you the voice clone, the script box and the consistency. Pick by the job, not by the reel.

How to actually do it

Record a 30 second script of yourself and clone the voice in whatever tool you already pay for; export the audio track.
Generate the same 10 second clip three ways: MiniMax H3 with a reference photo plus the audio, HeyGen's free tier with the same script, and one more model you can access; judge on mouth sync, teeth, hands and drift over 10 seconds.
Price the winner per finished minute at the volume you actually post, and skip the DM guide; the setup is the vendor's own docs.

MiniMax H3, Seedance 2.0 and HeyGen are all real and the comparison is plausible, but the reel shows no output and compares a raw video model to a packaged avatar service. The claim is an unsupported opinion attached to a lead-capture guide.

Confidence: Medium
Posted by: an AI-avatar tips creator (small page, ~1.9k views on the reel); reel sent to Buddy Thu Sep 24, 2026, ~9:30 PM

See the original claim →

We test hype for free. We build the real thing for a living.

Thirty minutes, no pitch — and you'll leave with something useful either way.

Book a call with Todd or start with the free Business Checkup →

The Verdict Weekly

Three verdicts every Friday. Free forever, unsubscribe anytime, no spam — that would be ironic.